
■ Subcommittee voted to build a measure examining the percentage of cesarean delivery
cases that converted to GA from an epidural (GA-03-OB)
○ Next meeting: December 7, 2022 1pm EST
○ If interested in joining the Obstetric Subcommittee, please contact Kate Buehler
(kjbucrek@med.umich.edu)
6. Measure Review: TEMP01 - Drs. Sunny Chiao (UVa) and Shafeena Nurani (Beaumont)
○ DISCUSSION:
■ Nirav Shah (MPOG QI Director): Fluid warmers are markers of success for cesarean deliveries
and was determined by quality committee in the past. We will run by the OB subcommittee
now that it is established to see if this still makes sense.
■ Aisha Qazi (Beaumont Health): Responsible provider should be the person signed in at
induction end since that is when you are placing the bair hugger. I think this is more
appropriate than provider signed in for longest duration
■ Tim Harwood (Wake Forest): With major burn cases sometimes we will raise the room
temperature. Could that be counted as active warming method for these cases.
● Nirav Shah (MPOG QI Director)- There is nothing we document with how the room
temperature has been set. Often times might be free text in a quick note which is hard
to capture.
● Aisha Qazi (Beaumont Royal Oak)- It seems like extensive burn cases should be excluded
from this measure given the TBSA%
● Mike Mathis (U of M Ann Arbor) via chat - Not to be too contrarian, but burn cases might
be the *most* important cases to include in this measure
● Kate Buehler (MPOG Coordinating Center) - Would echo what Dr. Mathis just put in the
chat- may be the most important patient population to warm and therefore include in
this measure. Will do a literature review to determine best practice specifically for burn
patients & how to warm in the OR
● Marc Pimentel (Brigham and Women’s)- we have a hypothermia prevention project for a
few years now. We rolled out an underbody warming device and next month are doing
prewarming gowns so all patients receive a gown to be prewarmed before going into the
OR to help reduce hypothermia intraop and postop. A paper came out recently in Lancet
looking at 35.5 vs. 37C doesn’t improve outcomes. Most still agree hypothermia is
something we are all concerned with but how does this paper influence the current
measures in MPOG?
● Nirav Shah (MPOG QI Director): I think we need to revisit TEMP-03 as more studies like
this come out and consider updating the threshold as necessary. Are you able to use the
ASPIRE measures as part of your hypothermia prevention effort at your site?
● Marc Pimental (Brigham and Women’s) - Yes. We’ve been using mostly TEMP-03. For
most of our cases we use active warming so didn’t find too much value in TEMP-01. We
were at 25% for TEMP-03 and then improved but are now back at 25% so I am not sure
that it is accurate or potentially a data/monitoring issue.
● Nirav Shah (MPOG QI Director) - We do have an MPOG concept for zero heat flux
monitors. I would be interested in looking at some preliminary data regarding how well