Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange (ASPIRE)
Quality Committee Meeting Notes – Monday, July 25, 2022
Attendance:
Abess, Alex (Dartmouth)
Khan, Meraj (Henry Ford Macomb)
Agerson, Ashley (Spectrum)
Koltun, Ksenia (Beaumont Royal Oak)
Applefield, Daniel (St. Joseph Oakland)
Lacca, Tory (MPOG)
Bailey, Meridith (MPOG)
LaGorio, John (Trinity Muskegon)
Biggs, Dan (Oklahoma)
Lewandowski, Kristyn (Beaumont)
Bollini, Mara (WUSTL)
Lopacki, Kayla (Mercy Health - Muskegon)
Boutin, Jimmy (Henry Ford Wyandotte)
Loyd, Gary (Henry Ford)
Buehler, Kate (MPOG)
Lu-Boettcher, Eva (Wisconsin)
Charette, Kristin (Dartmouth)
Malenfant, Tiffany (MPOG)
Chiao, Sunny (Virginia)
Mathis, Mike (MPOG)
Clark, David (MPOG)
McKinney, Mary (Beaumont Dearborn / Taylor)
Cohen, Bryan (Henry Ford - West Bloomfield)
Milliken, Christopher (Sparrow)
Coleman, Rob (MPOG)
Neuman, Drex (Utah)
Collins, Kathleen (St. Mary Mercy)
Obembe, Samson (Weill Cornell)
Corpus, Charity (Beaumont Royal Oak)
O’Dell, Diana (MPOG)
Cuff, Germaine (NYU)
Overmyer, Colleen (University of Chicago)
Davies, Eric (Henry Ford Allegiance)
Owens, Wendy (MyMichigan - Midland)
Dewhirst, Bill (Dartmouth)
Pardo, Nichole (Beaumont)
Domino, Karen (University of Washington)
Pimental, Marc Phillip (Brigham and Women's Hospital)
Dutton, Richard (US Anesthesia Partners)
Ping Yu, Shao (Weill Cornell)
Eagle, Mary (Henry Ford Allegiance)
Poindexter, Amy (Holland)
Esmail, Tariq (University Health Network)
Qazi, Aisha (Beaumont Troy)
Finch, Kim (Henry Ford Detroit)
Quinn, Cheryl (St. Joseph Oakland)
Fisher, Garrett (MyMichigan Midland)
Riggar, Ronnie (MPOG)
Gall, Glenn (St. Mary Mercy Livonia)
Rozek, Sandy (MPOG)
Hall, Meredith (Bronson)
Ruiz, Joe (MD Anderson)
Heiter, Jerri (St. Joseph A2)
Schwerin, Denise (Bronson)
Henson, Patrick (Vanderbilt)
Scranton, Kathy (Mercy St. Mary)
Horton, Brandy (A4)
Shah, Nirav (MPOG)
Johnson, Rebecca (Spectrum & Metro)
Smith, Susan (St. Joseph A2)
Kaper, Jon (Beaumont Trenton)
Toonstra, Rachel (Spectrum)
Tyler, Pam (Beaumont Farmington Hills)
Woody, Nathan (UNC)
Wren, Jessica (Henry Ford Wyandotte/Macomb)
Veach, Kristine (Trinity Ann Arbor, Chelsea, Livingston)
Agenda & Notes
1. Roll Call: Will contact QI Champions and ACQRs directly to inquire about participation status if
missing. Other participants can review meeting minutes and contact the Coordinating Center if they
are missing from the attendance record.
2. Minutes from May 23, 2022 meeting approved- minutes and recording posted on the website for
review
3. Announcements & Updates
MPOG Featured Member (July - August 2022): Jerri Heiter, RN - Trinity St. Joseph Ann Arbor,
Chelsea & Livingston
ASPIRE July Collaborative Meeting occurred on July 17, 2022. Meeting summary can be found on
our website
QI stories from UM Health West (Ben Stam, MD - SUS01) and Bronson Health (Meredith Hall,
MD - GLU05)
Hypotension associated outcomes (Kamal Maheshwari,MD - Cleveland Clinic) and Rational
vasopressor selection (Allison Janda,MD - UM Health Ann Arbor)
ASPIRE Performance review
PONV Toolkit is complete! Includes:
PONV Overview: Impact, Pathophysiology, and Risk Factors
Prophylaxis Recommendations
Treatment Recommendations
PONV Reference Guide
4. Upcoming Events
Committee Meetings
August 17th - Pediatric Subcommittee
August 22nd - Cardiac Subcommittee
September 26th - Quality Committee Meeting
December 7th - Obstetric Subcommittee
Annual ACQR Retreat - September 16, 2022 (DoubleTree Hotel, Ann Arbor)
Annual MPOG Retreat - October 21, 2022 (New Orleans, LA)
5. Obstetric Subcommittee Update
Met this past week with 20 participants in attendance
Slides, minutes, and recording posted on the website
Reviewed results of the measure build survey that was sent in February
Subcommittee voted to build a measure examining the percentage of cesarean delivery
cases that converted to GA from an epidural (GA-03-OB)
Next meeting: December 7, 2022 1pm EST
If interested in joining the Obstetric Subcommittee, please contact Kate Buehler
(kjbucrek@med.umich.edu)
6. Measure Review: TEMP01 - Drs. Sunny Chiao (UVa) and Shafeena Nurani (Beaumont)
DISCUSSION:
Nirav Shah (MPOG QI Director): Fluid warmers are markers of success for cesarean deliveries
and was determined by quality committee in the past. We will run by the OB subcommittee
now that it is established to see if this still makes sense.
Aisha Qazi (Beaumont Health): Responsible provider should be the person signed in at
induction end since that is when you are placing the bair hugger. I think this is more
appropriate than provider signed in for longest duration
Tim Harwood (Wake Forest): With major burn cases sometimes we will raise the room
temperature. Could that be counted as active warming method for these cases.
Nirav Shah (MPOG QI Director)- There is nothing we document with how the room
temperature has been set. Often times might be free text in a quick note which is hard
to capture.
Aisha Qazi (Beaumont Royal Oak)- It seems like extensive burn cases should be excluded
from this measure given the TBSA%
Mike Mathis (U of M Ann Arbor) via chat - Not to be too contrarian, but burn cases might
be the *most* important cases to include in this measure
Kate Buehler (MPOG Coordinating Center) - Would echo what Dr. Mathis just put in the
chat- may be the most important patient population to warm and therefore include in
this measure. Will do a literature review to determine best practice specifically for burn
patients & how to warm in the OR
Marc Pimentel (Brigham and Women’s)- we have a hypothermia prevention project for a
few years now. We rolled out an underbody warming device and next month are doing
prewarming gowns so all patients receive a gown to be prewarmed before going into the
OR to help reduce hypothermia intraop and postop. A paper came out recently in Lancet
looking at 35.5 vs. 37C doesn’t improve outcomes. Most still agree hypothermia is
something we are all concerned with but how does this paper influence the current
measures in MPOG?
Nirav Shah (MPOG QI Director): I think we need to revisit TEMP-03 as more studies like
this come out and consider updating the threshold as necessary. Are you able to use the
ASPIRE measures as part of your hypothermia prevention effort at your site?
Marc Pimental (Brigham and Women’s) - Yes. We’ve been using mostly TEMP-03. For
most of our cases we use active warming so didn’t find too much value in TEMP-01. We
were at 25% for TEMP-03 and then improved but are now back at 25% so I am not sure
that it is accurate or potentially a data/monitoring issue.
Nirav Shah (MPOG QI Director) - We do have an MPOG concept for zero heat flux
monitors. I would be interested in looking at some preliminary data regarding how well
we are capturing this.
VOTE:
Continue as is: No updates to measure specification
7. Measure Review: TEMP02 - Dr. Jonathan Kaper (Beaumont Trenton)
DISCUSSION:
Jon Kaper (Beaumont Trenton) - In my opinion we should include patients who receive
neuraxial and regional anesthesia
Kathleen Collins (Trinity Livonia) via chat: Issue with obtaining core temp is unchanged.
No access
Marc Pimental (Brigham and Women’s) - core temperature is important to monitor in
neuraxial/regional but am not sure the best way to measure core temperature in these
cases. zero heat flux monitor may be an option but somewhat expensive
Jon Kaper (Beaumont Trenton) - There is new literature showing that bladder and rectal
temperatures are less reliable as both sites are poorly perfused and lag core temperature. I
recommend excluding those routes from the ‘near core’ definition. Article Referenced:
https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/134/1/111/108291/Perioperative-Temperatu
re-Monitoring
Kathleen Collins (Trinity Livonia) via chat: No foleys in ortho cases. Zer0-flux temps are
cost-prohibitive in light of healthcare system deficits.
Nirav Shah (MPOG QI Director) - I’m curious what others think about bladder
temperature vs. axillary as core temp and which is more accurate given the bair hugger
use.
Karen Domino (University of Washington) - we routinely use bladder temp as it’s
convenient when you’re doing head and neck work and is the preferred temp route at
our institution.
VOTE: Continue as is: No updates to measure code - will add new reference from 2021 Sessler
Anesthesiology article to the specification
8. Web Case Viewer
A new version of web case viewer will be released by August 2022 and available for providers
after feedback emails are sent on 8/24/22
Includes updated UI
9. MPOG QI Tools
Measure Case Report Tool
Standard columns for patient, procedure and anesthesia type
Predetermined columns specific to measure to assist in flagged case review
Not customizable by the end user
Data Direct - Quality Mode
All measures now available as filters and outputs
Customizable columns
Current Limitations:
Limited to measure result; does not include other measure details
Columns limited to phenotypes and their definitions
Exports results on multiple spreadsheets
Next Steps:
What modifications would be helpful in Data Direct?
Are there additional visualizations/filters that would be helpful in QI Reporting?
In general, are there additional reporting needs that MPOG could meet?
DISCUSSION:
Jessica Wren (Henry Ford Macomb/Wyandotte) via chat: Visualization by service in the QI
Reporting Tool would be great
Meeting concluded at 1057 EST